Our manufacturing facility is equipped with the latest technology and equipment, which enables us to produce products that meet the highest standards. We have in-house design and manufacturing capabilities that allow us to respond quickly to customer requests and deliver high-quality products that meet their specific requirements. WiMo Antennas and Electronics GmbH has a wide range of capabilities to assist our customers with their product requirements for custom coaxial cables and custom antennas. Overall, WiMo makes the ordering process for custom wireless technology solutions easy and convenient for you. You have special requirements Our team is available to answer any questions or concerns you may have. Due to our technical background as radio amateurs and our many years of experience and close cooperation with our industrial customers, we can also develop custom solutions for any challenge and manufacture them directly in our production. WiMo designs and manufactures custom solutions for any application. WiMo can provide standard and custom solutions Browse through these categories to learn more about how WiMo can help you with most (amateur) radio and antenna needs with radios, antennas of all types, accessories, masts, cables, and connectors. We also have a wide range of antennas for industrial applications, such as antennas for ISM bands, antennas for the 868 MHz band, antennas for the 2.4 GHz band, antennas for the 5.8 GHz band, and many more. Our custom antennas are also tailored to our customers' needs and are available in a variety of frequencies and designs. Our custom coaxial cables are tailored to our customers' requirements and are available in a variety of sizes and configurations. We also offer a wide range of other products, such as special variants for RF connectors, RF cable assemblies and much more. Our product line includes custom coaxial cables and custom antennas for a wide range of industrial applications. We offer a wide range of products and services to meet our customers' industrial needs. Frequency Counter, Near Field Receivers.Morse keys, electronic keyers, accessories.Stationary, directional antennas (Yagi, X-Quad).
0 Comments
![]() If you’re set on ‘going vintage,’ that’s great, and many here do just that. The challenge, that you might be encountering, is finding modern amps or receivers that actually have tape monitor jacks. As others have pointed out, that 901 system was designed to work with an amp or receiver that has tape monitor inputs / outputs. You have vintage tech.which I’m sure you know. We here don’t know that, but for the sake of conversation, let’s assume that. So when you say that both the speakers and their EQ have been refurbished, let’s assume for now you meant professionally serviced. There will be no shortage of opinions, as you probably are learning. If you have the "in" jacks hooked to the "out" there is a possibility of cross-feed.įirst, welcome to the AK forum! Hope you can find good info here, as well as valuable opinions. Now if your receiver has a specific phone input, that is ONLY to be used with phonograph, and not regular components. It is my understanding that it is to be used as a line-level (speaker level) input. The tape monitor, I believe is not designed for use by the EQ for the 901s. Each will also have a "left" and "right" plug. They could also be labeled as "out" and "in". There are "record" and "playback" RCA connectors on their receiver and EQ. The "tape deck" would then be connect to the EQ. Here goes: The "tape monitor" function is basically in internal method of connecting an external equalizer. I thought it uses line level inputs, but I might be wrong. ![]() If one of those passwords is compromised, this is not a problem. They are mostly logins to some web sites, forums, like this one, and whatnot. I dare to say that 95% of my passwords are trivial. ![]() And I think this is the key to using it satisfactorily: Well, I’m using MacPass not as my “only solution”. (1Password or LastPass will not do this and they never will.) In other words: It can also fill-in credentials in app logins, system logins or other non-web-releted instances. You see, MacPass is not maintenance-free.īut, a side effect of this “very unsophisticated way to transfer data” is that MacPass also works with logins of arbitrary programs, or even System logins. So, with MacPass you must be prepared to lean it a hand:įor example, you notice that a password does not get filled in -> why -> find it out -> maybe the page title is not-unique, or it has changed since the last time, etc., -> but no major problem, since you can adjust all that. It is obvious that this can fail: Page title does not match, URL is not parsable in a meaningful way, etc. The Autotype is a shortcut (by default ⌃⌥M) and basically it is like a little Keyboard Maestro macro: It takes the entries from the database (name and password), checks if there is any window with a corresponding name open, and if Yes, it types the credentials into the fields. The main connection between MacPass and the browser (or other apps!) is the so-called Autotype. No Javascript, no Proxies, simple as that. The advantage of that concept is that there is no vulnerable connection between the database and your browser. If things are ambiguous you’ll have to held a hand, you’ll have to help the program. If things go well, those associations will be created automatically.There is or there is not an association between a record of that database with - for example a web page.It’s you who provide the data to that database (not a web browser or such). There is the kdbx database that holds the data (passwords, logins, etc.).The basic mechanism of MacPass (or KeePassXC) is: MacPass (or similar programs, like KeePassXC) are not focussing on that aspect. ![]() If you can do that, then no problem at all with MacPass.Īpplications like LastPass or 1Password try to integrate the “password entering experience” seamlessly with your browsing experience. For example a simple GUI macro that checks for a window title and clicks a particular button if that window is on screen. What is “less tech savvy users”? You are posting on the KM forum, so maybe I can assume that you are able to build a basic KM macro, and that you understand what you are building. No, I have not commented anything about that anywhere. Have you commented anywhere in more detail about MacPass vs 1Password for less tech savvy users? Would be great to have your view. I had commented this on my blog.Īnd, after all, the gained insight that Agilebits is not a trustworthy company has been the major motivation to look elsewhere for something more sincere. They are a gang of merchandising-skilled people, nothing more. Wow, great, guys, you really managed to string me along all the years just to tell me at the end „Here it is, go get a Family Subscription if you want it!”. Finally they arrived, but: only for subscribers of the then new subscription model (it was called “Team“ or something, at that time). Yeah, this has started one or two years ago the 1P app (as standalone app then) was in an incomplete state (for years already), essential functionalities were missing those functionalities had been promised to the customers for years. I have moved previous discussions (which were off-topic) to below.ġPassword has upgraded and are prioritizing memberships. If you have had significant experience with one or more password managers, please post below. Top 5 Password Managers for Mac, Feb 2017, /CorvettusĪnd there are more.The Five Best Password Managers, Aug 2017, /Alan Henry.The Best Password Managers, Feb 2018, Joe Kissel.I'm not going to list them here, but post some links to other reviews. I have done that, and it appears to me that there are at least five viable candidates, maybe more. Do an Internet search on "mac password manager", and go from there. Researchįirst, it is always best to do your own research. Do your homework, do some testing, and then pick the password manager that works best for you. Don't store your passwords in insecure places like text files, KM variables, Excel, Word, Pages, Numbers, etc. The most important point is to get and use a secure, reliable password manager. However, it is an important topic for all Mac users, and we have already had much discussion in another thread. Picking the Best Password Manager for Youįirst, my apologies to for starting a topic that is not directly related to Keyboard Maestro. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |